Before we study this letter, it is important to understand the historical background of the interlude between 1 and 2 Corinthians.[] In fact, we will look closely at the entire timeline regarding Paul’s ministry to the Corinthians, so that we can understand the issues Paul is referring to in 2 Corinthians. (For an extend introduction on the historical background Corinth, see our earlier article “Introduction to 1 Corinthians.”).
Paul planted the church in Corinth in the years between AD 50-52 (Acts 18).[] After Paul left, Apollos served as a leader and teacher in Corinth (Acts 19:1; 1 Cor. 1:12; 3:4-6, 22; 4:6; 16:12). During this time, Paul wrote a lost letter to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 5:9).
After Paul wrote his lost letter, the Corinthians responded with a letter of their own, asking Paul a number of questions (1 Cor. 7:1, 25; 8:1; 12:1; 16:1). Stephanus, Fortunatus, and Achaicus likely brought this letter to Paul, and he sent them back with the letter of 1 Corinthians (1 Cor. 16:17-18).
Paul wrote 1 Corinthians from Ephesus (1 Cor. 16:8), after several people came from Corinth to inform him about what was happening there (1 Cor. 1:11-12; 16:15-18). In 1 Corinthians, Paul wrote that he was going to come and visit (1 Cor. 4:18-19; 16:5). At this time, the Corinthians were already starting to become cynical or suspicious of Paul’s leadership (1 Cor. 4:18-19; 9:3-4; 14:37-38).
Paul sent Timothy to Corinth (1 Cor. 4:17; 16:10-11), and Timothy returned before Paul wrote his second letter (2 Cor. 1:1). Paul visited Corinth between the writing of 1 and 2 Corinthians. We know this because Paul writes that it was the “third time” he would be coming to them (2 Cor. 12:14; 13:1), implying a middle visit not mentioned in Acts. This visit did not go well (2 Cor. 2:1-5), and Paul wanted to visit them again on better terms. Paul wrote 2 Corinthians to pave the way for a better meeting with them (2 Cor. 12:14; 13:1-4, 10).
Titus visited Corinth during this time, and reported that false apostles had arisen. These men were accusing Paul’s legitimacy as an apostle, and they were teaching a false gospel (2 Cor. 11:1-20). Titus and Paul met up again in Macedonia (2 Cor. 2:12-13), and Titus revealed that things had only gone from bad to worse in Corinth:
After Paul’s stern rebuke in 1 Corinthians and his sorrowful visit, the Corinthians began to question if Paul really cared about them, because he changed his travel plans (2 Cor. 1:12, 17).
The Corinthians continued to fall into immorality and idol worship (2 Cor. 6:14ff).
The Corinthians criticized Paul for not taking money (1 Cor. 9:1-23; 2 Cor. 11:7-11; 12:13-16). They also may have accused him of taking money after all, because Paul needs to defend his integrity once again (2 Cor. 4:2; 7:2; 12:16-18).
Worst of all, false teachers had infiltrated this church (2 Cor. 10-13). These men had likely added fuel to the Corinthians’ suspicious fire.
This resulted in a polarized group: Some were intensely suspicious toward Paul, while others still loved him dearly (2 Cor. 7:6-7).
All of this sets the stage for the writing of 2 Corinthians. Paul picks up his quill pen and parchment to write something that will connect with the readers in Corinth, preparing them for his third visit.
Those who posit a lost letter between 1 and 2 Corinthians have a different timeline, because they understand Paul’s “harsh letter” to refer to this unknown letter. We hold that 1 Corinthians is the “harsh letter.” This will affect the timeline to some extent.
Paul Barnett, The Second Epistle to the Corinthians, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997), 5.
James is an elder at Dwell Community Church, where he teaches classes in theology, apologetics, and weekly Bible studies.